For risk & macro strategy teams

Turn event risk into a committee-grade input.

For elections, conflict, and policy – the risks that move portfolios without a clean instrument to quote.

Free to evaluate. No procurement process to start.

Committee recordCurrent
Event-risk benchmark
One continuous, citable series for the theme under review.
Timestamped
Quality-flagged
Methodology-linked
Designed to travel with the deck, dashboard, or note.
The moment of need

“What probability is the market assigning to this event?”

01

Without a benchmark

Search contracts. Choose one. Screenshot it. Explain the choice.

02

With a benchmark

Pull one thematic series with a published methodology and timestamp.

03

What changes

The discussion moves from sourcing the number to managing the risk.

How it becomes citable

From fragmented contracts to one governed record.

Public rules turn changing event contracts into a stable thematic series, with the evidence needed to understand how it was produced.

Evidence pipelinePublishing
Inputs
Election contractsLIVE
Conflict contractsLIVE
Policy contractsLIVE

Different expiries, liquidity, and contract language.

Public rulebook
01Selection screens
02Liquidity weighting
03Chain-linking

Judgment is set in public, then applied consistently.

Committee record
Event-risk benchmark
Continuous thematic series
As-published history
Freshness state
Methodology version
The venue data is public. The stable, governed measurement is the institutional layer.
Fits the work already happening

One governed series. Three institutional artifacts.

The index is not another destination to monitor. It is a source that drops into the deck, dashboard, or note your team already owns.

Event risk briefIC / 07.30
SOURCEBelief Index · methodology v1
01

Committee deck

A thematic series, source line, and methodology reference that another reader can verify.

Event-risk monitor
30-MIN CADENCEFRESH
02

Risk dashboard

Election, conflict, and policy expectations beside the market and exposure data you already track.

Macro note
The market repriced the event – not the cycle.
Source: Belief Systems
03

Client or strategy note

One attributable benchmark per theme, with a stable history for the next update.

The reliance layer

The number is public. The evidence around it is the product.

A benchmark earns its place in a committee pack by making its construction and failure states inspectable.

01

A record you can reproduce

Published compositions, weights, and chain-link arithmetic make every aggregate level independently checkable.

02

A history that stays put

As-published values are not silently rewritten. Corrections appear as new, labeled records.

03

Data quality in the open

Staleness and integrity states are carried with the series. Gaps are disclosed, not smoothed away.

04

A rulebook with a date

Methodology changes are versioned, dated, and applied prospectively.

13
Live indices
53,000+
Half-hourly observations
30 min
Valuation cadence
Jan 2026
Publishing since
Methodology paper on SSRN ↗Published reconstitution logs
90-day evaluation

Bring one event-risk question.

We will map the relevant Belief series, deliver a 90-day evaluation feed, and give your team the methodology and data dictionary needed to test it.

01

Name the live question

An election, conflict, policy, or regulatory event your team is already monitoring.

02

Test it in your workflow

Use the feed in a committee pack, dashboard, or note for 90 days.

03

Decide with evidence

Commercial terms only if the series earns a durable place in the process.